Lore talk:Bangkorai

The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
Jump to: navigation, search


Why is the province marked as Hammerfell in the template? It's obviously half High Rock, half Hammerfell, and if the template doesn't allow to enter both names, there should be none at all (as is in the case in some cross-provincial mountain ranges). The same goes for Reaper's March. --Vordur Steel-Hammer (TINV1K) 12:16, 16 January 2015 (GMT)

Actually, I personally would change it to High Rock alone. Contemporary with ESO, we know that the whole region is ruled from Evermore as a Covenant territory. Clearly the southern section is traditionally Hammerfell, but since the only time we see it is during ESO, using the political status of that time would be better than nothing. (Reaper's March, considering the loading screen calls it "Northern Valenwood", I would put under Valenwood for the same reason.) --Enodoc (talk) 12:56, 16 January 2015 (GMT)
The fact that Evermore rules the Fallen Wastes doesn't mean that it is not Hammerfell, it's only a matter of some agreement between the sides of the Covenant. As for Reaper's March, the loading screen calls it Northern Valenwood, but the game also calls it Elsweyr on other occasions if I remember correctly. Still, I think that these regions shouldn't be assigned to a single province; that would perhaps make sense in the Online namespace, but looks weird here. It would be ideal if we could enter two names in the Province field. Maybe the template can be altered? --Vordur Steel-Hammer (TINV1K) 13:08, 16 January 2015 (GMT)
Yeah that should be doable. I'll look into it. --Enodoc (talk) 14:21, 16 January 2015 (GMT)
OK, you can now use province2= and province3=. If you need another one, let me know. --Enodoc (talk) 14:43, 16 January 2015 (GMT)
Thank you! --Vordur Steel-Hammer (TINV1K) 15:21, 16 January 2015 (GMT)