Lore talk:Penitus Oculatus

The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
Jump to: navigation, search

Clean up[edit]

This needs to be cleaned up. I'm not really all that familiar with the Wiki markup. I tried to see how I can identify the source of the information on the page (The Infernal City), but I couldn't figure it out... ZTDGz 05:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

I managed to do some cleaning up, but the problem is that there isn't much info in the book. Also, we are still ironing out what we plan to do with the novel. –Elliot talk 05:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I didn't see much info in the book either. Are the blades really dissolved? Grayfox1128 00:28, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
The book doesn't say so. It's probably reasonable to assume the Blades were dissolved, but I'm not sure we should put it on the article. Recall that the Blades were more than just bodyguards; they also had an espionage role (think Caius Cosades in Morrowind) so why have the PO if the Blades are still around? rpeh •TCE 12:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


I think I've added just about everything that is provided by the info of TIC. So... is it still a stub?--Kalis AgeaYes? Contrib E-mail 18:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Is there no mention of when they where founded or why? Also is that the only accomplishment it talks about in the book?Wolfy 19:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay, first: No. I own TIC and read through it this week in preparation for work on TIC stubs. To my disappointment, there is almost no info on their history. Secondly, there is only vague, unclear mentionings of any other accomplishments. I'm convinced that until LOS and Skyrim are released, there is no more to be said about the Penitus Oculatus. Well, at least there is no more vital info.--Kalis AgeaYes? Contrib E-mail 19:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Well then I'd say it's as best as we can do, but do we really want to unstub it to only have to stub it in 113 days or so?
I was not around when any of the games where first out but I imagine a lot of the articles that where "done" became stubs Wolfy 19:25, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Well, the reason I want to remove the Stub tag is because I'm working on making all stub articles full articles, and having an article that is done be classified as a Lore stub gets pretty annoying.--Kalis AgeaYes? Contrib E-mail 19:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

() I think there's a bit more information that can be added. There's some detail about the ranks in the PO, for instance, and the recruitment process. rpeh •TCE 20:16, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I was thinking of adding that after the "Imperial assassins" sentence, but ended up posting here first. Let me go ahead and get that on the page.--Kalis AgeaYes? Contrib E-mail 20:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
There, all done. You may want to read the edit summary for why I said... what I said (that wording was a tad confusing).--Kalis AgeaYes? Contrib E-mail 20:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Just in case you were wondering, the old man Colin killed wasn't innocent. Colin's assessors just wouldn't tell him what the man had done to be assassinated. Legoless 21:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

() Yes, I know; I said "seemingly" because that's what Colin thought. In fact "seemingly" was supposed to imply that he was not innocent, not the other way around. However, it is less confusing the new way, I suppose.--Kalis AgeaYes? Contrib E-mail 21:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)