Semi Protection

UESPWiki:Deletion Review/Tes4Mod:Mod Ideas

The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
Jump to: navigation, search
This is an archive of past UESPWiki:Deletion Review discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page, except for maintenance such as updating links.

Tes4Mod:Mod Ideas

This page and it's several subpages have almost no useful content on them. Most suggestions either have mod ideas that already exist, or are simply impossible. Purely interesting suggestions are not a reason to keep these pages. --Arch-Mage MattTalk 00:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Strong Support I have had a longstanding hate of most dubious quality pages. I looked through these really quickly again and have decided that this needs to happen.--Corevette789 00:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Support If it were up to me, the whole namespace would be deleted, but this will do for now. Elliot (talk) 06:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Support It's always been a waste of time since most people who add "ideas" never bother to check if their "idea" has already been proposed or, indeed, created already. If deleted, this page at the OMW needs to be edited too. rpeh •TCE 08:36, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Support Other than that the articles are a pain to maintain, they are not even actual articles. They a sort of mix between articles like Roleplaying (documenting ideas) and talk pages, which is bad because no editor has a good clue what to do with the entries on these articles. Should spelling be corrected, should ideas be tweaked if they contain impossible demands? No proper guidelines were ever setup, and I fear only a few ideas are actually possible. There isn't any system that makes sure that ideas that have already been created are no longer added to the ideas lists or existing ideas being updated with that kind of information. The pages are basically a fancy message board, which I think does not belong here on this site. --Timenn-<talk> 16:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Support For reasons stated above --GKtalk2me 03:06, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Consensus: Delete. --GKtalk2me 18:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)