Online talk:Vampiric Furnishings

Top of Page Description

I'm a bit confused by the relevance of the description at the top of the page. I've been busy for a while, so I probably wasn't present for any conversations where this was discussed, but it feels like an opening blurb on how vampires came to be isn't necessary for a list of furnishings in their style. The blurb is very much related to vampire lore, and I'm glad someone's trying to spice this page up, but it's a little confusing to see all this information here: I'm having a hard time connecting the relevance of King Emeric studying under House Ravenwatch with the aesthetic style of vampires.

I would reduce the blurb to "The unique and lavish finish of most Vampiric furnishings may very well come from the melding of darkness and nobility.", but I wanted to make sure there wasn't a Discord conversation or a talk page I'd missed before making any changes. -MolagBallet (talk) 00:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Well I addressed the biggest issues with that, when I noticed it. It was for sure not relevant to the theme of the furnishings, and thus I made the corrections. While having these snippets is alright, not sure why they are needed, but since someone went to the trouble to add all these in. Its fine having them I guess. They need to be accurate to the theme of the furnishings. These vampiric ones for example, are clearly Gray Host/Nighthollow ordinated, and heavily so. Thus Lamae, Verandis and Emeric, should have never been used for the snippets. I corrected it by using a Gray Host one. Might find a Nighthollow one to go with it later. But for now, I addressed one of the biggest issues with it. TheVampKnight (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)